Bitte benutzen Sie diese Referenz, um auf diese Ressource zu verweisen: doi:10.22028/D291-48520
Titel: Ruling In and Ruling Out Sepsis Using Likelihood Ratios of a Host Response Assay
VerfasserIn: Navalkar, Krupa Arun
Wani, Prashant
Davis, Roy F.
Cermelli, Silvia
Dietrich, Maximilian
von der Forst, Maik
Becker, Sören L.
Benthien, Sophia
Baumann, Elisa
Zeiner, Carsten
Lepper, Philipp M.
Garnacho-Montero, José
Cantón-Bulnes, María Luisa
Fernández-Galilea, Adela
García-Garmendia, Jose Luis
Estella, Ángel
Miller, Russell R.
Schultz, Marcus J.
Rothman, Richard
Burke, John
Patel, Gourang
Parada, Jorge
Yager, Thomas D.
Brandon, Richard B.
Sprache: Englisch
Titel: Diagnostics
Bandnummer: 16
Heft: 15
Verlag/Plattform: MDPI
Erscheinungsjahr: 2026
Freie Schlagwörter: sepsis
SeptiCyte RAPID
likelihood ratio
host-response biomarker
systemic inflammatory response syndrome
SeptiScore
diagnostic accuracy
blood culture
intensive care unit
gene expression
DDC-Sachgruppe: 610 Medizin, Gesundheit
Dokumenttyp: Journalartikel / Zeitschriftenartikel
Abstract: Overview: SeptiCyte RAPID is an FDA-cleared gene expression test that quantifies host immune response to aid in the diagnosis of sepsis. The test yields a score (the SeptiScore) ranging from 0–15, distributed across four bands (1–4) based on increased likelihood of sepsis. Each band can be characterized by average positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR−, respectively) for the discrimination of sepsis versus the non-infectious systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a combined cohort of critically ill patients suspected of sepsis (n = 889), recruited across 19 hospitals in the USA and Europe. The analysis quantified the LR+ and LR− parameters as a function of SeptiScore, for discrimination of sepsis vs. SIRS in patients admitted to ICU. Hypotheses: (1) The likelihood ratio (LR) framework provides a clinically useful interpretive approach that complements the previously used SeptiScore banding scheme; (2) Low Band 1 SeptiScores are associated with sufficiently small LR− to support the use of SeptiCyte RAPID as a rule-out test for sepsis; (3) High Band 4 SeptiScores are associated with sufficiently large LR+ to support the use of SeptiCyte RAPID as a rule-in test for sepsis; and (4) SeptiScore-derived LR+ and LR− values can be combined with estimates of pre-test probability (derived from patient characteristics and/or other diagnostic tests) to generate individualized, patient-specific post-test probabilities of sepsis. Results: The SeptiCyte RAPID test demonstrates strong diagnostic performance in distinguishing sepsis from SIRS. The likelihood ratios across different score bands provide clear clinical utility: the median LR+ was 3.26 (range 2.57–4.24) for Band 3, and 6.97 (range 4.35–15.57) for Band 4, providing evidence toward ruling in sepsis at high SeptiScores. Conversely, the median LR− was 0.16 (range 0.14–0.20) for Band 2 and 0.085 (range 0.014–0.16) for Band 1, providing evidence toward ruling out sepsis at low SeptiScores. A higher-resolution analysis of SeptiCyte RAPID performance confirmed these trends by evaluating LR+ and LR− at specific values within each band. The sepsis group was further stratified according to whether patients were classified as blood culture positive (BC+) or blood culture negative (BC−), and the detailed LR+ and LR− analyses were repeated. A monotonic increase in likelihood ratio with increasing SeptiScore was consistently observed, independent of whether sepsis patients were culture-positive, culture-negative, or unstratified with respect to blood culture status. Conclusions: High SeptiScores have correspondingly high LR+ values, and low SeptiScores have correspondingly low LR− values, both of which may have clinical utility. High likelihood ratios for Band 4 SeptiScores, which precede traditional microbiology results, may provide clinicians with early confidence of a sepsis diagnosis and microbiology diagnostic stewardship. Low likelihood ratios for Band 1 SeptiScores may prompt clinicians to consider an alternate diagnosis to sepsis. These are diagnostic-performance-based observations; whether they translate into fewer missed diagnoses or more efficient use of hospital resources has not been directly assessed in this study and will require dedicated clinical outcome studies.
DOI der Erstveröffentlichung: 10.3390/diagnostics16152450
URL der Erstveröffentlichung: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16152450
Link zu diesem Datensatz: urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-485200
hdl:20.500.11880/42410
http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-48520
ISSN: 2075-4418
Datum des Eintrags: 14-Aug-2026
Bezeichnung des in Beziehung stehenden Objekts: Supplementary Materials
In Beziehung stehendes Objekt: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/diagnostics16152450/s1
Fakultät: M - Medizinische Fakultät
Fachrichtung: M - Infektionsmedizin
M - Innere Medizin
Professur: M - Prof. Dr. Robert Bals
M - Prof. Dr. Sören Becker
Sammlung:SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes

Dateien zu diesem Datensatz:
Datei Beschreibung GrößeFormat 
diagnostics-16-02450.pdf9,98 MBAdobe PDFÖffnen/Anzeigen


Diese Ressource wurde unter folgender Copyright-Bestimmung veröffentlicht: Lizenz von Creative Commons Creative Commons