Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: -no DOI; please use other URI
Title: The Corvis ST analysis of underaged versus adults' healthy eyes with comparable tomography detects softer corneas in children and adolescents as opposed to adults
Author(s): Flockerzi, Elias
Berger, Tim
Abu Dail, Yaser
Obst, Jessica
Sneyers, Albéric
Berger, Maximilian
Bofferding, Max
Kahlert, Julian
Paoletti, Tommaso
Teping, Paul
Kohlhas, Paul
Seitz, Berthold
Language: English
Title: Scientific Reports
Volume: 16
Issue: 1
Publisher/Platform: Springer Nature
Year of Publication: 2026
Free key words: Corneal biomechanics
Corvis
Tomography
Dynamic corneal response
DDC notations: 610 Medicine and health
Publikation type: Journal Article
Abstract: This cross-sectional cohort study aimed to analyze whether corneal biomechanics differ between healthy eyes of different age, even if they appear tomographically identical. All volunteers underwent corneal Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam) and biomechanical examination (Corvis ST, CST both Oculus, Germany). Three groups (G) were formed according to age: (G1) children aged 3–10 years (n = 250, 7.7 ± 1.9 years (mean ± standard deviation)), (G2) adolescents aged 11–20 years (n = 350, 15.3 ± 2.9 years) and (G3) adults (n = 100, 48.7 ± 13.8 years). Main tomographic outcome parameters were: flat anterior (K1F)/posterior (K1B) and steep anterior (K2F)/posterior (K2B) meridians, thinnest corneal thickness (TCT) and maximal anterior keratometry (Kmax). Considering biomechanics, these were deformation amplitude ratio 2 mm (DA ratio 2 mm), integrated radius (IR), Ambrósio Relational Thickness horizontal (ARTh), stiffness-parameter (SP-A1) and corneal velocity at inward applanation (A1 velocity), stress-strain-index (SSI), Corvis Biomechanical Index (CBI), Biomechanical E-Staging (BEST) and the CST-derived non-contact (IOPnct) and biomechanically adjusted intraocular pressure (bIOP). The groups were compared with Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA and Dunn’s post test. The three groups G1–G3 were tomographically comparable (p > 0.05 for K1F/K1B/K2F/K2B/TCT/Kmax). Biomechanically, there was no difference for DA ratio 2 mm and ARTh between G1–G3. Significant differences were found for SP-A1 (G1 < G2< G3, p = 0.0125), IR (G2 < G3, p = 0.0288), A1 velocity (G1 < G2< G3, p = 0.0027), SSI (G2 < G1< G3, p < 0.0001), CBI (G3 < G2< G1, p = 0.001), BEST (G3 < G2< G1, p = 0.0015), IOPnct (G3 < G1< G2, p = 0.0006) and bIOP (G3 < G2< G1, p < 0.0001). There exist small, yet significant biomechanical differences in CST measurements between tomographically comparable healthy corneas in dependence of age indicating biomechanically weaker corneas in children than in adults.
DOI of the first publication: 10.1038/s41598-026-52447-1
URL of the first publication: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-52447-1
Link to this record: urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-480613
hdl:20.500.11880/42040
ISSN: 2045-2322
Date of registration: 17-Jun-2026
Faculty: M - Medizinische Fakultät
Department: M - Augenheilkunde
Professorship: M - Prof. Dr. Berthold Seitz
M - Prof. Dr. med. Nóra Szentmáry
Collections:SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes

Files for this record:
File SizeFormat 
s41598-026-52447-1.pdf2,26 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons