Bitte benutzen Sie diese Referenz, um auf diese Ressource zu verweisen:
-kein DOI; bitte anderen URI nutzen
Titel: | Correlation of preoperative sonographic staging and postoperative histopathologic staging in patients with invasive breast cancer |
VerfasserIn: | Mueller, Carolin Zimmermann, Julia Sarah Maria Radosa, Marc Philipp Hahn, Anna Katharina Kaya, Askin Canguel Huwer, Sarah Stotz, Lisa Wagenpfeil, Gudrun Radosa, Christoph Georg Solomayer, Erich-Franz Radosa, Julia Caroline |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Titel: | Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics |
Bandnummer: | 310 |
Heft: | 5 |
Seiten: | 2623-2630 |
Verlag/Plattform: | Springer Nature |
Erscheinungsjahr: | 2024 |
Freie Schlagwörter: | Breast cancer Sonography Accuracy HER2 positive Breast imaging Breast cancer diagnostics |
DDC-Sachgruppe: | 610 Medizin, Gesundheit |
Dokumenttyp: | Journalartikel / Zeitschriftenartikel |
Abstract: | Purpose To assess the accuracy of preoperative sonographic staging in patients with primary invasive breast cancer. Methods We retrospectively analyzed a prospectively kept service database of patients with newly diagnosed, unifocal, cT1-3, invasive breast cancer. All patients were diagnosed at a single center institution between January 2013 and December 2021. Clinical T stage was assessed preoperatively by ultrasound and correlated with the defnite postoperative pathologic T stage. Demographics, clinical and pathological characteristics were collected. Factors infuencing accuracy, over- and underdiagnosis of sonographic staging were analyzed with multivariable regression analysis. Results A total of 2478 patients were included in the analysis. Median patients’ age was 65 years. 1577 patients (63.6%) had clinical T1 stage, 864 (34.9%) T2 and 37 (1.5%) T3 stage. The overall accuracy of sonography and histology was 76.5% (n=1896), overestimation was observed in 9.1% (n=225) of all cases, while underestimation occurred in 14.4% (n=357) of all cases. Accuracy increased when clinical tumor stage cT was higher (OR 1.23; 95% CI 1.10–1.38, p≤0.001). The highest accuracy was seen for patients with T2 stage (82.8%). The accuracy was lower in Luminal B tumors compared to Luminal A tumors (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.59–0.87, p≤0.001). We could not fnd any association between sonographic accuracy in HER2 positive patients, and demographic characteristics, or tumor-related factors. Conclusion Our unicentric study showed a high accuracy of sonography in predicting T stage, especially for tumors with clinical T2 stage. Tumor stage and biological tumor factors do afect the accuracy of sonographic staging. |
DOI der Erstveröffentlichung: | 10.1007/s00404-024-07699-5 |
URL der Erstveröffentlichung: | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00404-024-07699-5 |
Link zu diesem Datensatz: | urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-436026 hdl:20.500.11880/39063 |
ISSN: | 1432-0711 |
Datum des Eintrags: | 29-Nov-2024 |
Fakultät: | M - Medizinische Fakultät |
Fachrichtung: | M - Frauenheilkunde M - Medizinische Biometrie, Epidemiologie und medizinische Informatik |
Professur: | M - Prof. Dr. E.-F. Solomayer M - Prof. Dr. Stefan Wagenpfeil |
Sammlung: | SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes |
Dateien zu diesem Datensatz:
Datei | Größe | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
s00404-024-07699-5.pdf | 994,88 kB | Adobe PDF | Öffnen/Anzeigen |
Diese Ressource wurde unter folgender Copyright-Bestimmung veröffentlicht: Lizenz von Creative Commons