Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: doi:10.22028/D291-42510
Title: Effect of a metal artifact reduction algorithm on dehiscence and fenestration detection around zirconia implants with cone beam computed tomography
Author(s): Freire, Bernardo Barbosa
Wanderley, Victor Aquino
Câmara, João Victor Frazão
Santos, Lethycia Almeida
Ferrari, Carolina Ruis
Araujo, Tamara Teodoro
Chilvarquer, Israel
Language: English
Title: Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
Volume: 138
Issue: 2
Pages: 316-323
Publisher/Platform: Elsevier
Year of Publication: 2024
DDC notations: 610 Medicine and health
Publikation type: Journal Article
Abstract: Objective. To assess the efficacy of the metal artifact reduction algorithm (MARA) of the Cranex 3D cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) device in the detection of peri-implant dehiscence and fenestration around zirconia implants. Study Design. In total, 60 implants were placed in bovine ribs. Dehiscence and fenestration defects were created around the implants, after which 60 CBCT images were obtained with and 60 without activation of MARA. Three radiologists examined the images for the presence of defects. The area under the curve (AUC) from receiver operating characteristic analysis, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated to assess the ability to discriminate the presence vs absence of bone defects. One-way analysis of variance was employed to analyze outcome measures. The significance level was established at 5% (a = 0.05). Results. AUC values indicated excellent discrimination of dehiscence on images with MARA activation and an excellent to outstanding range of discrimination with MARA deactivation. For fenestration, MARA activation and deactivation both led to outstanding discrimination. Sensitivity and specificity values revealed that activation of MARA was helpful in distinguishing the presence vs. absence of dehiscence, while both MARA conditions were helpful for fenestration. However, there were no statistically significant differences between MARA activation and deactivation for any outcome measure (P >.05). Conclusion. CBCT is suitable for detecting peri-implant defects, but MARA application does not significantly affect peri-implant dehiscence and fenestration detection. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2024;138:316-323)
DOI of the first publication: 10.1016/j.oooo.2024.02.023
URL of the first publication: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2024.02.023
Link to this record: urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-425106
hdl:20.500.11880/38155
http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-42510
ISSN: 2212-4403
Date of registration: 2-Aug-2024
Faculty: M - Medizinische Fakultät
Department: M - Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde
Professorship: M - Prof. Dr. Matthias Hannig
Collections:SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes

Files for this record:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S2212440324000889-main.pdf505,63 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons