Bitte benutzen Sie diese Referenz, um auf diese Ressource zu verweisen:
doi:10.22028/D291-42510
Titel: | Effect of a metal artifact reduction algorithm on dehiscence and fenestration detection around zirconia implants with cone beam computed tomography |
VerfasserIn: | Freire, Bernardo Barbosa Wanderley, Victor Aquino Câmara, João Victor Frazão Santos, Lethycia Almeida Ferrari, Carolina Ruis Araujo, Tamara Teodoro Chilvarquer, Israel |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Titel: | Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology |
Bandnummer: | 138 |
Heft: | 2 |
Seiten: | 316-323 |
Verlag/Plattform: | Elsevier |
Erscheinungsjahr: | 2024 |
DDC-Sachgruppe: | 610 Medizin, Gesundheit |
Dokumenttyp: | Journalartikel / Zeitschriftenartikel |
Abstract: | Objective. To assess the efficacy of the metal artifact reduction algorithm (MARA) of the Cranex 3D cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) device in the detection of peri-implant dehiscence and fenestration around zirconia implants. Study Design. In total, 60 implants were placed in bovine ribs. Dehiscence and fenestration defects were created around the implants, after which 60 CBCT images were obtained with and 60 without activation of MARA. Three radiologists examined the images for the presence of defects. The area under the curve (AUC) from receiver operating characteristic analysis, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated to assess the ability to discriminate the presence vs absence of bone defects. One-way analysis of variance was employed to analyze outcome measures. The significance level was established at 5% (a = 0.05). Results. AUC values indicated excellent discrimination of dehiscence on images with MARA activation and an excellent to outstanding range of discrimination with MARA deactivation. For fenestration, MARA activation and deactivation both led to outstanding discrimination. Sensitivity and specificity values revealed that activation of MARA was helpful in distinguishing the presence vs. absence of dehiscence, while both MARA conditions were helpful for fenestration. However, there were no statistically significant differences between MARA activation and deactivation for any outcome measure (P >.05). Conclusion. CBCT is suitable for detecting peri-implant defects, but MARA application does not significantly affect peri-implant dehiscence and fenestration detection. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2024;138:316-323) |
DOI der Erstveröffentlichung: | 10.1016/j.oooo.2024.02.023 |
URL der Erstveröffentlichung: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2024.02.023 |
Link zu diesem Datensatz: | urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-425106 hdl:20.500.11880/38155 http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-42510 |
ISSN: | 2212-4403 |
Datum des Eintrags: | 2-Aug-2024 |
Fakultät: | M - Medizinische Fakultät |
Fachrichtung: | M - Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde |
Professur: | M - Prof. Dr. Matthias Hannig |
Sammlung: | SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes |
Dateien zu diesem Datensatz:
Datei | Beschreibung | Größe | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1-s2.0-S2212440324000889-main.pdf | 505,63 kB | Adobe PDF | Öffnen/Anzeigen |
Diese Ressource wurde unter folgender Copyright-Bestimmung veröffentlicht: Lizenz von Creative Commons