Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: doi:10.22028/D291-41847
Title: Comparison of three creatinine-based equations to predict adverse outcome in a cardiovascular high-risk cohort: an investigation using the SPRINT research materials
Author(s): Emrich, Insa E.
Pickering, John W.
Götzinger, Felix
Kramann, Rafael
Kunz, Michael
Lauder, Lucas
Papademetriou, Vasilios
Böhm, Michael
Heine, Gunnar H.
Mahfoud, Felix
Language: English
Title: Clinical Kidney Journal
Volume: 17
Issue: 2
Publisher/Platform: Oxford University Press
Year of Publication: 2024
Free key words: cardiovascular risk prediction
CKD-EPI 2009 equation
CKD-EPI 2021 equation
classification
estimated glomerular filtration rate
European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) equation
DDC notations: 610 Medicine and health
Publikation type: Journal Article
Abstract: Background. Novel creatinine-based equations have recently been proposed but their predictive performance for cardiovascular outcomes in participants at high cardiovascular risk in comparison to the established CKD-EPI 2009 equation is unknown. Method. In 9361 participants from the United States included in the randomized controlled SPRINT trial, we calculated baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the CKD-EPI 2009, CKD-EPI 2021, and EKFC equations and compared their predictive value of cardiovascular events. The statistical metric used is the net reclassification improvement (NRI) presented separately for those with and those without events. Results. During a mean follow-up of 3.1 ± 0.9 years, the primary endpoint occurred in 559 participants (6.0%). When using the CKD-EPI 2009, the CKD-EPI 2021, and the EKFC equations, the prevalence of CKD (eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 or >60 ml/min/1.73 m2 with an ACR ≥30 mg/g) was 37% vs. 35.3% (P = 0.02) vs. 46.4% (P < 0.001), respectively. The corresponding mean eGFR was 72.5 ± 20.1 ml/min/1.73 m2 vs. 73.2 ± 19.4 ml/min/1.73 m2 (P < 0.001) vs. 64.6 ± 17.4 ml/min/1.73 m2 (P < 0.001). Neither reclassification according to the CKD-EPI 2021 equation [CKD-EPI 2021 vs. CKD-EPI 2009: NRIevents: −9.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) −13.0% to −5.9%); NRInonevents: 4.8% (95% CI 3.9% to 5.7%)], nor reclassification according to the EKFC equation allowed better prediction of cardiovascular events compared to the CKD-EPI 2009 equation (EKFC vs. CKD-EPI 2009: NRIevents: 31.2% (95% CI 27.5% to 35.0%); NRInonevents: −31.1% (95% CI −32.1% to −30.1%)). Conclusion. Substituting the CKD-EPI 2009 with the CKD-EPI 2021 or the EKFC equation for calculation of eGFR in participants with high cardiovascular risk without diabetes changed the prevalence of CKD but was not associated with improved risk prediction of cardiovascular events for both those with and without the event.
DOI of the first publication: 10.1093/ckj/sfae011
URL of the first publication: https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfae011
Link to this record: urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-418472
hdl:20.500.11880/37445
http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-41847
ISSN: 2048-8505
Date of registration: 4-Apr-2024
Description of the related object: Supplementary data
Related object: https://oup.silverchair-cdn.com/oup/backfile/Content_public/Journal/ckj/17/2/10.1093_ckj_sfae011/1/sfae011_supplemental_file.docx?Expires=1715245244&Signature=EOdGS3XYdbI4yu7vyNhYjFe-MnOcSRh1gWKdPAT6WpcFEr4eg9EqAqmWK-kxe8VQp3YTnrdkpM-l55U-4j~xvKu5a3LccOOgaI4QdHGai9jJGB-taFP0pwBDhho67WK3s-QaRlHiO-1If5ViTT1vE-pPXTRzdv81IaJ4TKLp8TJkFdflQVm8CmIP2fgASgXmWBZMBj5cuIGA6yhzfva3oOQutbi5BLTIbuyp618-IcC8WGJVjkaC7WfWsKt9vnq822J2EEahVoA6pUBZ3QQCEE~pVyuAfX~Ua3DoK8KGLmMzx21t5y9NFaL9Mu0lN3mA4IkRBd~hq8rBuSV87Hb4cA__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAIE5G5CRDK6RD3PGA
Faculty: M - Medizinische Fakultät
Department: M - Innere Medizin
Professorship: M - Prof. Dr. Michael Böhm
Collections:SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes

Files for this record:
File Description SizeFormat 
sfae011.pdf1,34 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons