Bitte benutzen Sie diese Referenz, um auf diese Ressource zu verweisen: doi:10.22028/D291-46120
Titel: Hesitant Minds in Vulnerable Times: COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Among University Students in Ukraine
VerfasserIn: Yeboah, Prince
Razouk, Afraa
Skotzke, Philip
Pitsch, Werner
Chubuchna, Olena
Serhiyenko, Victoria
Slyvka, Nataliia
Holota, Serhii
Nasim, Muhammad Jawad
Abdin, Ahmad Yaman
Jacob, Claus
Sprache: Englisch
Titel: COVID
Bandnummer: 5
Heft: 8
Verlag/Plattform: MDPI
Erscheinungsjahr: 2025
Freie Schlagwörter: conspiracy theories
COVID-19 vaccines
health communication
health knowledge
attitudes
practice
information sources
misinformation
psychological antecedents
students
vaccine hesitancy
DDC-Sachgruppe: 370 Erziehung, Schul- und Bildungswesen
500 Naturwissenschaften
Dokumenttyp: Journalartikel / Zeitschriftenartikel
Abstract: COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy (VH), like attitudes towards other vaccines, is a critical global public health concern. Despite numerous studies covering psychological, sociodemo graphic, and other determinants of vaccine acceptance, resistance, and hesitance, few studies have reported these factors among students, particularly in politically unstable settings like Ukraine. This cross-sectional, descriptive, and quantitative study assesses hesitancy towards COVID-19 vaccines, utilizing the 5Cs Model. Among 936 respondents surveyed in 2023, 64% received at least one shot of the COVID-19 vaccine (acceptant), 11% were still considering getting vaccinated (hesitant), and 25% refused vaccination (re sistant). Vaccination behavior is significantly associated with the 5Cs. Higher collective responsibility significantly increased acceptance and reduced resistance, while higher con straints lowered the chances of being either acceptant or resistant. Confidence protected against resistance. Complacency, counterintuitively, reduced odds of resistance, pointing to differences between passive hesitancy and active refusal. Male gender and sources of information and misinformation influenced confidence. Collective responsibility was posi tively associated with official sources and negatively with conspiracy beliefs. Complacency increased with official sources, while constraints and calculation were least explained by predictors. Practical barriers should be tackled through improved accessibility and foster ing collective responsibility via targeted communication strategies. These findings provide actionable insights for policymakers, healthcare providers, and academic institutions to enhance vaccine uptake among university students, particularly in crisis settings.
DOI der Erstveröffentlichung: 10.3390/covid5080122
URL der Erstveröffentlichung: https://doi.org/10.3390/covid5080122
Link zu diesem Datensatz: urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-461200
hdl:20.500.11880/40442
http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-46120
ISSN: 2673-8112
Datum des Eintrags: 29-Aug-2025
Fakultät: HW - Fakultät für Empirische Humanwissenschaften und Wirtschaftswissenschaft
NT - Naturwissenschaftlich- Technische Fakultät
Fachrichtung: HW - Sportwissenschaft
NT - Pharmazie
Professur: HW - Prof. Dr. Eike Emrich
NT - Prof. Dr. Claus Jacob
Sammlung:SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes

Dateien zu diesem Datensatz:
Datei Beschreibung GrößeFormat 
covid-05-00122.pdf1,29 MBAdobe PDFÖffnen/Anzeigen


Diese Ressource wurde unter folgender Copyright-Bestimmung veröffentlicht: Lizenz von Creative Commons Creative Commons